EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 202 / Numéro 4 (2008) J. Soc. Biol., 202 4 (2008) 265-273 References
Free Access
Issue
J. Soc. Biol.
Volume 202, Number 4, 2008
Os et cartilage - Structure, métabolisme, vieillissement
Page(s) 265 - 273
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio:2008035
Published online 19 décembre 2008
  • Benhamou C.L., Lespessailles E. & Jacquet G., Architecture osseuse trabéculaire: caractérisation par une méthode d'analyse fractale. Rev Rhum, 1994a, 61, 297–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benhamou C.L., Lespessailles E., Jacquet G., Harba R., Jennane R. & Loussot, Fractal organization of trabecular bone images on calcaneus radiographs. J Bone Miner Res, 1994b, 9, 1909–1918. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Black D.M., Steinbach M., Palermo L., Dargent-Molina P., Lindsay R. & Hoseyni M.S., An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int, 2001, 12, 519–528. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bousson V., Bergot C., Meunier A., Barbot F., Parlier-Cuan C. & Laval-Jeantet A.M., CT of the Middiaphyseal femur: cortical bone mineral density and relation to porosity. Radiology, 2000, 217, 179–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chappard C., Imbault B.B., Lemineur G., Giraudeau B., Basillais A. & Harba R., Anisotropy changes in post-menopausal osteoporosis: characterization by a new index applied to trabecular bone radiographic images. Osteop Int, 2005, 16, 1193–1202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chappard D., Legrand E., Haettich B., Chales G., Auvinet B. & Eschard J.P., Fractal dimension of trabecular bone: comparison of three histomorphometric computed techniques for measuring the architectural two-dimensional complexity. J Pathol, 2001, 195, 515–521. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chung H.W., Wehrly F.W. & Wehrly S.L., Three dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance microimaging of trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res, 1995, 10, 1452–1461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis, Am J Med, 1993, 94, 646–650. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper D.M.L., Turinsky A.L., Jensen C.W. & Hallgrimsson B., Quantitative 3D analysis of the canal network in cortical bone by micro-computed tomography. Anat Rec, 2003, 274, 169–179. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cortet B. & Marchandise X., Bone microarchitecture and mechanical resistance. J Bone Spine, 2000, 168, 297–305. [Google Scholar]
  • Cortet B., Colin D., Dubois P., Delcambre B. & Marchandise X., Les différentes méthodes d'analyse quantitative de la structure osseuse trabéculaire. Rev Rhum, 1995, 62, 841–855. [Google Scholar]
  • Cortet B., Dubois P., Boutry N., Palos G., Cotton A. & Marchandise X., Computed tomography image analysis of the calcaneus in male osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int, 2002, 13, 33–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cross S.S., Rogers S., Silcocks P.B. & Cotton D.W.K., Trabecular bone does not have a fractal structure on light microscopic examination. J Pathol, 1993, 170, 311–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cummings S.R., Bates D. & Black D.M., Clinical use of bone densitometry. Scientific review, JAMA, 2002, 288, 1889–900. [Google Scholar]
  • Durand E.P. & Ruegsegger P., Cancellous bone structure: analysis of high-resolution CT images with the run-length method. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1991, 115, 133–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feldkamp L.A., Goldstein S.A., Parfitt A.M., Tesion G. & Kleerekoper M., The direct examination of three dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res, 1989, 4, 3–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Genant H.K., Engelke K., Fuerst T., Gluer C.C., Grampp S., Harris S.T., Jergas M., Lang T., Lu Y., Majumdar S., Mathur A. & Takada M., Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res, 1996, 11, 707–730. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hahn M., Vogel M., Pompesus-Kempa M. & Delling G., Trabecular bone pattern factor: a new parameter for simple quantification of bone microarchitecture. Bone, 1992, 13, 327–330. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hildebrand T. & Ruegsegger P., Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 1997, 1, 15–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hochberg M., Greenspan S., Wasnich R., Miller P., Thomson D. & Ross P., Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of non vertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002, 87, 1586–1592. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kanis JA., Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. The Lancet, 2002, 359, 1929–1936. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Legrand E., Chappard D., Basle M.F. & Audran M., Évaluation de la microarchitecture trabéculaire osseuse: perspectives pour l'évaluation du risque fracturaire. Rev Rhum, 1999, 66, 619–624. [Google Scholar]
  • Lespessailles E., Chappard C., Bonnet N. & Benhamou CL. Imaging techniques for evaluating bone microarchitecture. Joint Bone Spine, 2006, 73, 254–261. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lespessailles E., Gadois C., Kousignian I., Neveu J.P., Fardellone P., Kolta S., Roux C., Do-Huu J.P., Benhamou C.L., Clinical interest of bone texture analysis in osteoporosis: a case control multicenter study. Osteoporos Int, 2008, 19, 1019–1028. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lespessailles E., Gadois C., Lemineur G., Do-Huu J.P., Benhamou L., Bone texture analysis on direct digital radiographic images: precision study and relationship with bone mineral density at the os calcis. Calcif Tissue Int, 2007, 80, 97–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Link T.M., Majumdar S., Lin J.C., Newitt D., Augat P. & Vuyang X., A comparative study of trabecular bone properties in the spine and femur using high resolution MRI and CT. J Bone Miner Res, 1998, 13, 122–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Link T.M., Majumdar S., Augat P., Lin J.C., Newitt D. & Lu Y., In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res, 1998, 13, 1175–1182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mc Creade R.B. & Goldstein A.S., Biomechanics of fracture: is bone mineral density sufficient to assess risk. J Bone Miner Res, 2000, 15, 2305–2308. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Muller R., The Zurich experience: one decade of three-dimensional high-resolution computed tomography. Top Magn Reson Imag, 2002, 13, 307–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newitt D.C., Majumdar S., Van Rietbergen B., Von Ingersleben G., Harris S.T. & Genant H.K., In vivo assessment of architecture and micro finite element analysis derived indices of mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the radius. Osteoporos Int, 2002, 13, 6–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • NIH, Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. JAMA, 2001, 285, 785–795. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Odgaard A., Jensen E.B. & Gundersen H.L.G., Estimation of structural anisotropy, based on volume orientation. A new concept. J Microsc, 1990, 157, 149–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Parfitt A.M., Stereologic basis of bone histomorphometry theory of quantitative microscopy and reconstruction of the third dimension. Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1983, 53–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Peyrin F., Muller C., Carillon Y., Nuzzo S., Bonnassie A. & Briguet A., Synchrotron radiation micro-CT: a reference tool for the characterization of bone samples. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2001, 496, 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Pothuaud L., Benhamou C.L., Porion P., Lespessailles E., Harba R. & Lewitz P., Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res, 2000b, 15, 691–699. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pothuaud L., Porion P., Lespessailles E., Benhamou C.L. & Levitz P., A new method for three-dimensional skeleton graph analysis of porous media: application to trabecular bone microarchitecture. J Microsc, 2000a, 199, 149–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Kapadia R.D., Stroup G.B., Badger A.M., Koller B., Levin J.M. & Coatney R.W., Applications of micro-CT and MR microscopy to study preclinical models of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Technol Health Care, 1998, 6, 361–372. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rachidi M., Marchadier A., Gadois C., Lespessailles E., Chappard C., Benhamou C.L. Laws' masks descriptors applied to bone texture analysis: an innovative and discriminant tool in osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiology, 2008, 37, 541–548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Recker R.R., Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • Schuit S.C., V.D. Klift M. & Weel A.E., Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone, 2004, 34, 195–202. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stein M.S., Feik S.A., Thomas C.D.L., Clement J.G. & Wark J.D., An automated analysis of intracortical porosity in human femoral bone across age. J Bone Miner Res, 1999, 14, 624–632. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wachter N.J., Augat P., Krischak G.D., Mentzel M., Kinzl L. & Claes L., Prediction of cortical bone porosity in vitro by microcomputed tomography, Calcif Tissue Int, 2001, 68, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Wainwright S.A., Marshall L.M. & Ensrud K.E., Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005, 90, 2787–2793. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Watts N.B., Cooper C., Lindsay R., Eastell R., Manhart M. & Barton I.P., Relationship between changes in bone mineral density and vertebral fracture risk associated with risedronate. J Clin Densitom, 2004, 7, 256–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wehrli F.W., Saha P.K., Gomberg B.R., Song H.K., Snyder P.J. & Benito M., Role of magnetic resonance for assessing structure and function of trabecular bone. Top Magn Reson Imag, 2002, 13, 335–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wehrli F.W., Hwang S.N. & Ma J., Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: non invasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. Radiology, 1998, 206, 347–357 (Erratum in. Radiology, 1998, 207, 833). [Google Scholar]
  • Whitehouse W.J., The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone. J Microsc, 1974, 1, 153–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.