EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 202 / Numéro 4 (2008) J. Soc. Biol., 202 4 (2008) 265-273 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
J. Soc. Biol.
Volume 202, Numéro 4, 2008
Os et cartilage - Structure, métabolisme, vieillissement
Page(s) 265 - 273
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio:2008035
Publié en ligne 19 décembre 2008
  • Benhamou C.L., Lespessailles E. & Jacquet G., Architecture osseuse trabéculaire: caractérisation par une méthode d'analyse fractale. Rev Rhum, 1994a, 61, 297–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benhamou C.L., Lespessailles E., Jacquet G., Harba R., Jennane R. & Loussot, Fractal organization of trabecular bone images on calcaneus radiographs. J Bone Miner Res, 1994b, 9, 1909–1918. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Black D.M., Steinbach M., Palermo L., Dargent-Molina P., Lindsay R. & Hoseyni M.S., An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int, 2001, 12, 519–528. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bousson V., Bergot C., Meunier A., Barbot F., Parlier-Cuan C. & Laval-Jeantet A.M., CT of the Middiaphyseal femur: cortical bone mineral density and relation to porosity. Radiology, 2000, 217, 179–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chappard C., Imbault B.B., Lemineur G., Giraudeau B., Basillais A. & Harba R., Anisotropy changes in post-menopausal osteoporosis: characterization by a new index applied to trabecular bone radiographic images. Osteop Int, 2005, 16, 1193–1202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chappard D., Legrand E., Haettich B., Chales G., Auvinet B. & Eschard J.P., Fractal dimension of trabecular bone: comparison of three histomorphometric computed techniques for measuring the architectural two-dimensional complexity. J Pathol, 2001, 195, 515–521. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chung H.W., Wehrly F.W. & Wehrly S.L., Three dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance microimaging of trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res, 1995, 10, 1452–1461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis, Am J Med, 1993, 94, 646–650. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper D.M.L., Turinsky A.L., Jensen C.W. & Hallgrimsson B., Quantitative 3D analysis of the canal network in cortical bone by micro-computed tomography. Anat Rec, 2003, 274, 169–179. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cortet B. & Marchandise X., Bone microarchitecture and mechanical resistance. J Bone Spine, 2000, 168, 297–305. [Google Scholar]
  • Cortet B., Colin D., Dubois P., Delcambre B. & Marchandise X., Les différentes méthodes d'analyse quantitative de la structure osseuse trabéculaire. Rev Rhum, 1995, 62, 841–855. [Google Scholar]
  • Cortet B., Dubois P., Boutry N., Palos G., Cotton A. & Marchandise X., Computed tomography image analysis of the calcaneus in male osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int, 2002, 13, 33–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cross S.S., Rogers S., Silcocks P.B. & Cotton D.W.K., Trabecular bone does not have a fractal structure on light microscopic examination. J Pathol, 1993, 170, 311–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cummings S.R., Bates D. & Black D.M., Clinical use of bone densitometry. Scientific review, JAMA, 2002, 288, 1889–900. [Google Scholar]
  • Durand E.P. & Ruegsegger P., Cancellous bone structure: analysis of high-resolution CT images with the run-length method. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1991, 115, 133–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feldkamp L.A., Goldstein S.A., Parfitt A.M., Tesion G. & Kleerekoper M., The direct examination of three dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res, 1989, 4, 3–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Genant H.K., Engelke K., Fuerst T., Gluer C.C., Grampp S., Harris S.T., Jergas M., Lang T., Lu Y., Majumdar S., Mathur A. & Takada M., Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res, 1996, 11, 707–730. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hahn M., Vogel M., Pompesus-Kempa M. & Delling G., Trabecular bone pattern factor: a new parameter for simple quantification of bone microarchitecture. Bone, 1992, 13, 327–330. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hildebrand T. & Ruegsegger P., Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 1997, 1, 15–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hochberg M., Greenspan S., Wasnich R., Miller P., Thomson D. & Ross P., Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of non vertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002, 87, 1586–1592. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kanis JA., Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. The Lancet, 2002, 359, 1929–1936. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Legrand E., Chappard D., Basle M.F. & Audran M., Évaluation de la microarchitecture trabéculaire osseuse: perspectives pour l'évaluation du risque fracturaire. Rev Rhum, 1999, 66, 619–624. [Google Scholar]
  • Lespessailles E., Chappard C., Bonnet N. & Benhamou CL. Imaging techniques for evaluating bone microarchitecture. Joint Bone Spine, 2006, 73, 254–261. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lespessailles E., Gadois C., Kousignian I., Neveu J.P., Fardellone P., Kolta S., Roux C., Do-Huu J.P., Benhamou C.L., Clinical interest of bone texture analysis in osteoporosis: a case control multicenter study. Osteoporos Int, 2008, 19, 1019–1028. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lespessailles E., Gadois C., Lemineur G., Do-Huu J.P., Benhamou L., Bone texture analysis on direct digital radiographic images: precision study and relationship with bone mineral density at the os calcis. Calcif Tissue Int, 2007, 80, 97–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Link T.M., Majumdar S., Lin J.C., Newitt D., Augat P. & Vuyang X., A comparative study of trabecular bone properties in the spine and femur using high resolution MRI and CT. J Bone Miner Res, 1998, 13, 122–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Link T.M., Majumdar S., Augat P., Lin J.C., Newitt D. & Lu Y., In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res, 1998, 13, 1175–1182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mc Creade R.B. & Goldstein A.S., Biomechanics of fracture: is bone mineral density sufficient to assess risk. J Bone Miner Res, 2000, 15, 2305–2308. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Muller R., The Zurich experience: one decade of three-dimensional high-resolution computed tomography. Top Magn Reson Imag, 2002, 13, 307–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newitt D.C., Majumdar S., Van Rietbergen B., Von Ingersleben G., Harris S.T. & Genant H.K., In vivo assessment of architecture and micro finite element analysis derived indices of mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the radius. Osteoporos Int, 2002, 13, 6–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • NIH, Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. JAMA, 2001, 285, 785–795. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Odgaard A., Jensen E.B. & Gundersen H.L.G., Estimation of structural anisotropy, based on volume orientation. A new concept. J Microsc, 1990, 157, 149–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Parfitt A.M., Stereologic basis of bone histomorphometry theory of quantitative microscopy and reconstruction of the third dimension. Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1983, 53–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Peyrin F., Muller C., Carillon Y., Nuzzo S., Bonnassie A. & Briguet A., Synchrotron radiation micro-CT: a reference tool for the characterization of bone samples. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2001, 496, 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Pothuaud L., Benhamou C.L., Porion P., Lespessailles E., Harba R. & Lewitz P., Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res, 2000b, 15, 691–699. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pothuaud L., Porion P., Lespessailles E., Benhamou C.L. & Levitz P., A new method for three-dimensional skeleton graph analysis of porous media: application to trabecular bone microarchitecture. J Microsc, 2000a, 199, 149–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Kapadia R.D., Stroup G.B., Badger A.M., Koller B., Levin J.M. & Coatney R.W., Applications of micro-CT and MR microscopy to study preclinical models of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Technol Health Care, 1998, 6, 361–372. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rachidi M., Marchadier A., Gadois C., Lespessailles E., Chappard C., Benhamou C.L. Laws' masks descriptors applied to bone texture analysis: an innovative and discriminant tool in osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiology, 2008, 37, 541–548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Recker R.R., Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • Schuit S.C., V.D. Klift M. & Weel A.E., Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone, 2004, 34, 195–202. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stein M.S., Feik S.A., Thomas C.D.L., Clement J.G. & Wark J.D., An automated analysis of intracortical porosity in human femoral bone across age. J Bone Miner Res, 1999, 14, 624–632. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wachter N.J., Augat P., Krischak G.D., Mentzel M., Kinzl L. & Claes L., Prediction of cortical bone porosity in vitro by microcomputed tomography, Calcif Tissue Int, 2001, 68, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Wainwright S.A., Marshall L.M. & Ensrud K.E., Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2005, 90, 2787–2793. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Watts N.B., Cooper C., Lindsay R., Eastell R., Manhart M. & Barton I.P., Relationship between changes in bone mineral density and vertebral fracture risk associated with risedronate. J Clin Densitom, 2004, 7, 256–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wehrli F.W., Saha P.K., Gomberg B.R., Song H.K., Snyder P.J. & Benito M., Role of magnetic resonance for assessing structure and function of trabecular bone. Top Magn Reson Imag, 2002, 13, 335–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wehrli F.W., Hwang S.N. & Ma J., Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: non invasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. Radiology, 1998, 206, 347–357 (Erratum in. Radiology, 1998, 207, 833). [Google Scholar]
  • Whitehouse W.J., The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone. J Microsc, 1974, 1, 153–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.