Accès gratuit
| Numéro |
Biologie Aujourd'hui
Volume 211, Numéro 3, 2017
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 233 - 237 | |
| Section | La biologie computationnelle parle à la biologie expérimentale | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2017029 | |
| Publié en ligne | 7 février 2018 | |
- Allison, D.B., Brown, A.W., George, B.J., Kaiser, K.A. (2016). Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors. Nature, 530, 27-29. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker, M. (2016). Muddled meanings hamper efforts to fix reproducibility crisis. Nature News. DOI: 10.1038/nature.2016.20076. [Google Scholar]
- Belmann, P., Dröge, J., Bremges, A., McHardy, A.C., Sczyrba, A., Barton, M.D. (2015). Bioboxes: standardised containers for interchangeable bioinformatics software. Gigascience, 4, 47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blankenberg, D., Von Kuster, G., Bouvier, E., Baker, D., Afgan, E., Stoler, N; Galaxy Team, Taylor J., Nekrutenko, A. (2014). Dissemination of scientific software with Galaxy ToolShed. Genome Biol, 15, 403. [Google Scholar]
- Bray, N. L., Pimen tel, H., Melsted, P., Pachter, L. (2016). Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol, 34, 525-527. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byron, S.A., Van Keuren-Jensen, K.R., Engelthaler, D.M., Carpten, J.D., Craig, D.W. (2016). Translating RNA sequencing into clinical diagnostics: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Genet, 17, 257-271. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Tommaso, P. (2016). A curated list of Nextflow pipelines. Available at: https://github.com/nextflow-io/awesome-nextflow/ (Accessed: 18th May 2016). [Google Scholar]
- Di Tommaso, P., Chatzou, M., Floden, E.W., Prieto Barja, P., Palumbo, E., Notredame, C. (2017). Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotech, 35, 316-319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Garijo, D., Kinnings, S., Xie, L., Xie, L., Zhang, Y., Bourne, P.E., Gil, Y. (2013). Quantifying reproducibility in computational biology: the case of the tuberculosis drugome. PLoS One, 8, e80278. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goecks, J., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J. (2010). Galaxy Team. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol, 11, R86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Sci Transl Med, 8, 341ps12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hosny, A., Vera-Licona, P., Laubenbacher, R., Favre, T. (2016). AlgoRun: a Docker-based packaging system for platform-agnostic implemented algorithms. Bioinformatics, 32, 2396-2398. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koster, J., Rahmann, S. (2012). Snakemake-a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine. Bioinformatics, 28, 2520-2522. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurs, J.P., Simi, M., Campagne, F. (2016). NextflowWorkbench: Reproducible and reusable workflows for beginners and experts. bioRxiv, 041236. DOI: 10.1101/041236. [Google Scholar]
- LeVeque, R.J., Mitchell, I.M., Stodden, V. (2012). Reproducible research for scientific computing: Tools and strategies for changing the culture. Comput Sci Eng, 14, 13-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Loman, N., Watson, M. (2013). So you want to be a computational biologist? Nat Biotechnol, 31, 996-998. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masca, N.G., Hensor, E.M., Cornelius, V.R., Buffa, F.M., Marriott, H.M., Eales, J.M., Messenger, M.P., Anderson, A.E., Boot, C., Bunce, C., Goldin, R.D, Harris, J., Hinchliffe, R.F., Junaid, H., Kingston, S., Martin-Ruiz, C., Nelson, C.P., Peacock, J., Seed, P.T., Shinkins, B., Staples, K.J., Toombs, J., Wright, A.K., Teare, M.D. (2015). RIPOSTE: a framework for improving the design and analysis of laboratory-based research. Elife, 4. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05519. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Moreews, F., Sallou, O., Ménager, H., Le Bras, Y., Monjeaud, C., Blanchet, C., Collin, O. (2015). BioShaDock: a community driven bioinformatics shared Docker-based tools registry. F1000Res, 4, 1443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perkel, J. (2016). Democratic databases: science on GitHub. Nature News, 538, 127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Piccolo, S.R., Frampton, M.B. (2016). Tools and techniques for computational reproducibility. Gigascience, 5, 30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis, A. (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22, 2688-2690. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinbiss, S., Silva-Franco, F., Brunk, B., Foth, B., Hertz-Fowler, C., Berriman, M., Otto, T.D. (2016). Companion: a web server for annotation and analysis of parasite genomes. Nucleic Acids Res, 44, W29-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vivian, J. (2016). Rapid and efficient analysis of 20, 000 RNA-seq samples with Toil. bioRxiv, 062497. DOI: 10.1101/062497. [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.